Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 01 May 2011 15:59:12 -0700 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] fork: avoid weak function arch_dup_task_struct |
| |
On 05/01/2011 12:25 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:26:35 +0200 Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com> wrote: > >> Avoid potential gcc bug by not using a weak function for >> arch_dup_task_struct. Use an #ifdef'ed static function for >> archs that don't have a special arch_dup_task_struct implementation. > > The patch is unreviewable (and hence unusable) if you don't describe > this "potential gcc bug". >
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.3/3202.html
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
|  |