lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill
From
Date
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:10 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:38 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > > The syntax may seem strange,
> >
> > It does!
> >
> > > but basically it just says "don't let me by y if RFKILL is m"
> >
> > ... but, besides that, I can be any value. So in effect it's shorthand
> > for
> > depends on RFKILL=y || RFKILL=m && m || RFKILL=n
> >
> > (which actually looks equally strange). Is that correct?
>
> I don't think it is, I believe that an expression like "RFKILL=y" has a
> bool type, and a tristate type value that depends on a bool type can
> still take the value m.

Err, which is of course perfectly fine since if RFKILL is built in this
can be any value, and in the RFKILL=m case you force it to m by making
it depend on m directly. So yes, you're right.

johannes



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-06 22:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site