Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:09:58 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -tip v3 3/6] perf branch trace: print pid and command |
| |
Em Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:15:07PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:11:10AM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > > On 04/01/11 09:13, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > But well, we can start simple and make and just do the => trick > > > if we have PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR and resolve addr if the user asked > > > the sym. Then when we have the graph output, have these per evsel > > > display callbacks.
> > There is another email thread about page faults. The user wants sample > > address resolved to symbols. I was going to look into it next week when > > I get back from vacation.
> What we seem to need for that is to bring a pagefault tracepoint. We had > propositions for that in the past, but work on this is in pause mode it > seems.
Isn't there one in the 'tip/tmp.perf/trace' tmp branch? Lemme see...
Yeah, and it is even yours ;-)
commit 6a824e89c0dfe6bce3d7e85f987ec9c8e7304b34 Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Date: Fri Nov 12 05:35:06 2010 +0100
perf, mm: Add fault tracing
Part of that are two modified patches from Jiri Olsa who added the fault tracepoints. I had to split them in two tracepoints so that we get the faults handling duration.
Originally-from: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Can we dust this one off and get the ball rolling again?
- Arnaldo
| |