lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] driver core: let dev_set_drvdata return int instead of void as it can fail
2011/4/6 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> Hello,
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:36:46AM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>> 2011/4/6 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
>> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> > ---
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I wasn't sure what to return when dev_set_drvdata is called with
>> > dev=NULL.  I choosed 0, but -EINVAL would be OK for me, too. What do you
>> > think?
>> Why not just BUG_ON(!dev)? Is there a case when you might call this
>> with dev==NULL that's not a driver bug?
> I think BUG_ON is too harsh. Will resend with -EINVAL.

Maybe just WARN_ON, then? Please? ;-)

Error return with no other visible sign is easy to miss for driver
writers. Big bad backtrace in dmesg on the other hand attracts
attention.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-06 13:27    [W:0.204 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site