Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:19:09 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool |
| |
On 04/03/2011 04:09 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 04/03/2011 05:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 04/03/2011 12:59 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: >>> Hi Avi, >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >> Note that this is a development prototype for the time being: >>> there's no >>> >> networking support and no graphics support, amongst other missing >>> >> essentials. >>> > >>> > Mind posting a roadmap? I would put smp support near the top. >>> This sort of >>> > thing has to be designed in, otherwise you wind up with a big >>> lock like >>> > qemu. >>> >>> What are the pain points with qemu at the moment? >> >> It's an ugly gooball. > > Because it solves a lot of very difficult problems. > > You could drop all of the TCG support and it'd still be an ugly gooball. > > Supporting lots of different emulated hardware devices, live > migration, tons of different types of networking and image formats, > etc., all adds up over time.
Sure, any succcesful project becomes an ugly gooball. It's almost a compliment.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| |