lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3.1] kbuild: implement several W= levels
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:24:46 +0200, Michal Marek said:
    > On 28.4.2011 02:25, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
    > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:35:13 +0200, Borislav Petkov said:
    > >
    > >> If we do this inclusive, then W=2 dumps the, let's call it, level 1
    > >> _plus_ the new level 2 warnings, polluting the output with something
    > >> I've already seen, but only partially. And then I start to think, did
    > >> I see this one already, didn't I, which was it? By the time you enable
    > >> W=3, the output becomes pretty useless. For example, W=3 generates 190+
    > >> MB logfile here only with level 3 warnings. Now imagine all 3 levels
    > >> combined.
    > >
    > > If each level is averaging 10x the previous level, then all 3 levels will only be 11%
    > > bigger, or 211MB.
    > >
    > > You *really* want to get *all* the warnings - quite often, you'll be looking
    > > at a set of 15 or 20 level-3 warnings. And if you had the Level-2's in there as
    > > well, you'd immediately realize that the single level-2 was the real root-cause
    > > of all the cascating warnings.
    >
    > How about W=12 for level 1 and 2 warnings and W=123 for all levels?

    I'd be OK with that, or a 'W=all', or whatever, as long as it's doable.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-04-28 20:03    [W:0.022 / U:0.816 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site