lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Regulator state after regulator_get
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:27:46PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm not sure what "supply_nasty" would mean? This also doesn't seem
> > like something that we can set up per supply - it's going to affect the
> > whole regulator state, it's not something that only affects a single
> > supply.

> supply_nasty() would be used to define a regulator which is enabled by
> the boot loader when it shouldn't be, which is the actual problem.

That's *really* not a clear name.

> How should this regulator be turned off in the boot by the kernel?

Have you read my previous mail where I described the existing support
for doing this when we have a full set of information on the regualtors
in the systems?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-28 12:43    [W:0.033 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site