lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Regulator state after regulator_get
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:44:10AM +0000, kalle.jokiniemi@nokia.com wrote:

> > Another alternative to the first option you proposed could be to add a
> > flags field to regulator_consumer_supply, and use a flag to recognise
> > regulators which need to be disabled during initialisation. The flag
> > could be set by using a new macro e.g. REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NASTY() when
> > defining the regulator.

> This sounds like a good option actually. Liam, Mark, any opinions?

I'm not sure what "supply_nasty" would mean? This also doesn't seem
like something that we can set up per supply - it's going to affect the
whole regulator state, it's not something that only affects a single
supply.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-28 12:23    [W:0.050 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site