lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/7] seccomp_filter: add process state reporting
    From
    On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:21 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
    <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
    >> Adds seccomp and seccomp_filter status reporting to proc.
    >> /proc/<pid>/status will include a Seccomp field, and
    >> /proc/<pid>/seccomp_filter will provide read-only access
    >> to the current filter and bitmask set for seccomp_filters.
    >>
    >> Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
    >> ---
    >>  fs/proc/array.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
    >>  fs/proc/base.c  |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    >>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
    >
    > I'm not againt seccomp_filter. but I dislike to increase /proc/<pid>/status mess.
    > 1) it's read from a lot of applications, I don't want to worry about performance
    > thing. 2) 99.99% user never use seccomp. this field is useless for them.
    >
    > Can't you make individual seccomp specific file?

    Definitely. Would it make sense to have /proc/<pid>/seccomp and
    /proc/<pid>/seccomp_filter?
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-04-28 05:27    [W:0.024 / U:0.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site