[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC 6/8] In order putback lru core
    On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
    <> wrote:
    > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:25:23 +0900
    > Minchan Kim <> wrote:
    >> This patch defines new APIs to putback the page into previous position of LRU.
    >> The idea is simple.
    >> When we try to putback the page into lru list and if friends(prev, next) of the pages
    >> still is nearest neighbor, we can insert isolated page into prev's next instead of
    >> head of LRU list. So it keeps LRU history without losing the LRU information.
    >> Before :
    >>       LRU POV : H - P1 - P2 - P3 - P4 -T
    >> Isolate P3 :
    >>       LRU POV : H - P1 - P2 - P4 - T
    >> Putback P3 :
    >>       if (P2->next == P4)
    >>               putback(P3, P2);
    >>       So,
    >>       LRU POV : H - P1 - P2 - P3 - P4 -T
    >> For implement, we defines new structure pages_lru which remebers
    >> both lru friend pages of isolated one and handling functions.
    >> But this approach has a problem on contiguous pages.
    >> In this case, my idea can not work since friend pages are isolated, too.
    >> It means prev_page->next == next_page always is false and both pages are not
    >> LRU any more at that time. It's pointed out by Rik at LSF/MM summit.
    >> So for solving the problem, I can change the idea.
    >> I think we don't need both friend(prev, next) pages relation but
    >> just consider either prev or next page that it is still same LRU.
    >> Worset case in this approach, prev or next page is free and allocate new
    >> so it's in head of LRU and our isolated page is located on next of head.
    >> But it's almost same situation with current problem. So it doesn't make worse
    >> than now and it would be rare. But in this version, I implement based on idea
    >> discussed at LSF/MM. If my new idea makes sense, I will change it.
    > I think using only 'next'(prev?) pointer will be enough.

    I think so but let's wait other's opinion. :)
    Kind regards,
    Minchan Kim
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-04-28 01:45    [W:0.023 / U:10.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site