lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH][RESEND] Fix EDD3.0 data verification.
Check for nonzero path in edd_has_edd30() has no sense. First, it looks
at the wrong memory. Device path starts at offset 30 of the info->params
structure which is at offset 8 from the beginning of info structure,
but code looks at info + 4 instead. This was correct when code was
introduced, but around v2.6.4 three more fields were added to edd_info
structure (commit 66b61a5c in history.git). Second, even if it will check
correct memory it will always succeed since at offset 30 (params->key)
there will be non-zero values otherwise previous check would fail.

The patch replaces this bogus check with one that verifies checksum.

Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
---
Here https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/16/305 Peter said he will pull it into
the tree, but I do not see this patch applied anywhere.

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/edd.c b/drivers/firmware/edd.c
index 96c25d9..f1b7f65 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/edd.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/edd.c
@@ -531,8 +531,8 @@ static int
edd_has_edd30(struct edd_device *edev)
{
struct edd_info *info;
- int i, nonzero_path = 0;
- char c;
+ int i;
+ u8 csum = 0;

if (!edev)
return 0;
@@ -544,16 +544,16 @@ edd_has_edd30(struct edd_device *edev)
return 0;
}

- for (i = 30; i <= 73; i++) {
- c = *(((uint8_t *) info) + i + 4);
- if (c) {
- nonzero_path++;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (!nonzero_path) {
+
+ /* We support only T13 spec */
+ if (info->params.device_path_info_length != 44)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (i = 30; i < info->params.device_path_info_length + 30; i++)
+ csum += *(((u8 *)&info->params) + i);
+
+ if (csum)
return 0;
- }

return 1;
}
--
Gleb.

--
Gleb.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-26 10:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site