lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH V3 4/4] cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states
    Date
    Hi Trinabh,

    Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

    [...]

    > I just wanted to get comments on the design and understand how it
    > affects various architectures in question. It looks to me as if the
    > design should be okay and infact better for architectures like ARM
    > since they do not have different idle states for different cpus and
    > thus do not require per-cpu registration. Global registration would
    > work and be simpler; please correct me if I am wrong.

    Yes, I agree that the new design is better, I especially like that it's
    more clear (and expected) that final state decision making is to be done
    directly in the driver without the back-and-forth in the current setup.

    Thanks,

    Kevin


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-04-23 01:09    [W:0.025 / U:0.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site