lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to expand_upwards
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 13:19 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
    > I looked at converting parisc to sparsemem and there's one problem that
    > none of these cover. How do you set up bootmem? If I look at the
    > examples, they all seem to have enough memory in the first range to
    > allocate from, so there's no problem. On parisc, with discontigmem, we
    > set up all of our ranges as bootmem (we can do this because we
    > effectively have one node per range). Obviously, since sparsemem has a
    > single bitmap for all of the bootmem, we can no longer allocate all of
    > our memory to it (well, without exploding because some of our gaps are
    > gigabytes big). How does everyone cope with this (do you search for
    > your largest range and use that as bootmem or something)?

    Sparsemem is purely post-bootmem. It doesn't deal with sparse
    bootmem. :(

    That said, I'm not sure you're in trouble. One bit of bitmap covers 4k
    (with 4k pages of course) of memory, one byte covers 32k, and A 32MB
    bitmap can cover 1TB of address space. It explodes, but I think it's
    manageable. It hasn't been a problem enough up to this point to go fix
    it.

    -- Dave



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-04-22 22:27    [W:0.022 / U:32.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site