lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pci: Export pci device msi table via sysfs
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:10:41PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:57:47PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > b) msi_table - populated only if msi(x) is enabled, it lists the irqs allocated
> > to the pci device
>
> You're not the first one to try this ... the problem is, you can easily
> overflow a single 4k page. A device can have up to 2k MSI-X entries,
> and we might take up to 5 bytes for each one, so we'd need a 10k buffer.
>
Yeah, I was a bit worried about that - but I didn't think any sane device would
allocate en entire 2048 irqs (not that thats an excuse). I had considered doing
an export format like local_cpulist where consecutive irq allocations are listed
as first-last, which would save space and keep us inside a page. Thoughts?

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> > +static ssize_t msi_list_show(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > + struct msi_desc *entry;
> > + int first, last;
> > + ssize_t count = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!(pdev->msi_enabled || pdev->msix_enabled))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(entry, &pdev->msi_list, list)
> > + count += sprintf(&buf[count], "%d ", entry->irq);
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> The fundamental problem is that the way Linux uses MSI-X is completely
> bollocks. I've got a few hours to myself on a plane coming up in six
> weeks, and I hope to rewrite it then (I've already written my talk, so
> what else am I going to do? :-)
>
Fair enough, I assume when you say 'it' you are referring to (or including) the
way the sysfs attributes are exported, so that we can use seq_file more
flexibly, and break the page limitation?

Regards
Neil

> --
> Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
> operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
> a retrograde step."
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-21 22:03    [W:0.044 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site