Messages in this thread | | | From | Hui Zhu <> | Date | Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:27:50 +0800 | Subject | Re: KGTP (Linux Kernel debugger and tracer) 20110405 release |
| |
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:46, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 04:25:28PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote: >> After a discussion with Dongdong, I think I have different idea with that. >> >> 1. I don't want change the current interface of kgtp. Because a proc >> interface is very simple and stable interface. >> And with proc, kgtp can very easy connect with GDB without Kernel > > Can you use the debugfs interface instead of proc. Proc is too > overloaded as is, and debugfs seems to be a perfect match in this case. > > -- Steve
Hi Steve,
I really agree with what you said. I will change it. Thank a lot.
Best, Hui
> >> help. Please see >> https://code.google.com/p/kgtp/wiki/HOWTO#Make_GDB_connect_to_gtp and >> https://code.google.com/p/kgtp/wiki/HOWTO#Offline_debug >> >> 2. I don't want remove the kprobe. Because what I want kgtp is to be >> a Linux Kernel tracepoint interface with gdb. I will add other >> tracepoint like TRACE_EVENT. >> And move it to gdb breakpoint is too far away from it. And it is too >> much depend on kgdb. >> >> Of course, I am very happy to share the GDB rsp tracepoint parse code >> with kgdb to make it support gdb tracepoint. >> Trust me, My code is more clear than the doc of GDB. :) >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |