lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Add generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:35:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I've had similar thoughts with respect to the regulator API - I'd been
> > thinking of dealing with this by adding a notifier which subsystems
> > could build upon, in much the same way as already exists for the system
> > ssuspend and resume events.

> Well, I generally avoid using notifiers, because they lead to big functions
> that carry out many different tasks.

> That said, I think consolidation and reduction of duplicate code is all good,
> this way or another. :-)

Well, if you're comfortable with adding explicit regulator API hooks in
the code directly then I can just do that - I'd been thinking notifiers
since they mean you don't have to worry about what's going on with it
but if you're happy with making it explicit that's fine by me also.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-20 14:01    [W:0.076 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site