[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: moving expire targets for background/kupdate works
    On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:00:03AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
    > Andrew,
    > This aims to reduce possible pageout() calls by making the flusher
    > concentrate a bit more on old/expired dirty inodes.

    In what situation is this a problem? Can you demonstrate how you
    trigger it? And then how much improvement does this patchset make?

    > Patches 04, 05 have been updated since last post, please review.
    > The concerns from last review have been addressed.
    > It runs fine on simple workloads over ext3/4, xfs, btrfs and NFS.

    But it starts propagating new differences between background and
    kupdate style writeback. We've been trying to reduce the number of
    permutations of writeback behaviour, so it seems to me to be wrong
    to further increase the behavioural differences. Indeed, why do we
    need "for kupdate" style writeback and "background" writeback
    anymore - can' we just use background style writeback for both?


    Dave Chinner

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-04-19 08:41    [W:0.019 / U:38.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site