lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 8/9] OMAP1 / PM: Use generic clock manipulation routines for runtime PM
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 01:43:28AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> @@ -75,24 +69,7 @@ static int __init omap1_pm_runtime_init(
> if (!cpu_class_is_omap1())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - pm = platform_bus_get_pm_ops();
> - if (!pm) {
> - pr_err("%s: unable to get dev_pm_ops from platform_bus\n",
> - __func__);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> -
> - omap_pm = kmemdup(pm, sizeof(struct dev_pm_ops), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!omap_pm) {
> - pr_err("%s: unable to alloc memory for new dev_pm_ops\n",
> - __func__);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> -
> - omap_pm->runtime_suspend = omap1_pm_runtime_suspend;
> - omap_pm->runtime_resume = omap1_pm_runtime_resume;
> -
> - platform_bus_set_pm_ops(omap_pm);
> + pm_runtim_clock_add_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &platform_bus_notifier);
>
Presumably you meant pm_runtime_clock_add_notifier() here. You seem to
have the same typo in a few other places too.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-04-18 10:21    [W:0.448 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site