Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:39:30 -0600 | From | David Ahern <> | Subject | Re: adding trace-cmd's plugins to perf |
| |
On 04/12/11 13:01, Borislav Petkov wrote: >>> Also, just FYI, I have this RAS daemon patchset which splits perf functionality >>> into different sub-libs, which are more or less topic based: >>> >>> tools/lib/trace/ - all the trace-event* stuff from Steven >>> tools/lib/lk/ - generic enough stuff (git headers, etc) which several tools could use
Is this going to contain the option parsing as well? e.g., something tools/kvm is picking up from perf.
>>> tools/lib/perf/ - functionality related to perf events >>> >>> Here's the last submission http://marc.info/?l=linux-edac&m=129562244211501&w=2 >>> and I'm currently finishing a new rebase against tip/perf/core. >>> >>> If you're fine with that split I'd suggest I load off my stuff first so >>> that David can continue from there and I can finally stop rebasing like >>> crazy each time perf moves forward. >>> >>> Opinions? Suggestions? >> >> Yeah, David, can you try Borislav's patchset and tell us what you think >> wrt servicing your needs? > > Yeah, but first let me post the latest version - I'll try to do so in > the next couple of days. > > Thanks. >
Sure. This is a background task, and I still need to spend time on trace-cmd to understand it. ie. it's not something I expect to do within the next week -- more like within the next month if I get the time.
David
| |