Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:28:30 -0600 | | Subject | Re: [PWM v6 1/3] PWM: Implement a generic PWM framework | | From | Bill Gatliff <> |
| |
Lars:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> wrote: > On 03/06/2011 07:16 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> On 03/06/2011 05:17 AM, Bill Gatliff wrote: >>> + >>> + >>> +pwm_set_handler() -- Defines an end-of-period callback. The indicated >>> +function will be invoked in a worker thread at the end of each PWM >>> +period, and can subsequently invoke pwm_config(), etc. Must be used >>> +with extreme care for high-speed PWM outputs. Set the handler >>> +function to NULL to un-set the handler. >>> + > > This looks like a poor man's IRQ handler implementation. In my opinion something > like pwm_to_irq would be better suited interface.
Not sure what you mean here. Can you elaborate?
b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@billgatliff.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |