Messages in this thread | | | From | Mike Frysinger <> | Date | Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:03:11 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] proc: constify status array |
| |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:56, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> -static const char *task_state_array[] = { >> +static const char * const task_state_array[] = { > > Why this is needed for task_state_array, but not for, say, tgid_base_stuff?
tgid_base_stuff is already declared const. which your nm output clearly shows.
> This double const is ugly.
quite the opposite. not declaring const arrays const is ugly. -mike
| |