lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH 1/5] fs/9p: Fix revalidate to return correct value
On 03/25/2011 01:50 PM, Venkateswararao Jujjuri wrote:
> On 03/25/2011 04:30 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> revalidate should return> 0 on success.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V<aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Venkateswararao Jujjuri <jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>> ---
>> fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c b/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
>> index b6a3b9f..59c5ddc 100644
>> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
>> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int v9fs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry
>> *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
>> retval = v9fs_refresh_inode_dotl(fid, inode);
>> else
>> retval = v9fs_refresh_inode(fid, inode);
>> - if (retval<= 0)
>> + if (retval< 0)
This change is causing tuxera rename test failure with acls enabled.

/root/pjd-fstest-20080816/tests/rename/10.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 188 Failed: 6)
Failed tests: 65, 71, 74, 77, 79-80
The comment in namei says:
" If d_revalidate returned 0 attempt to invalidate the dentry
otherwise d_revalidate is asking us
to return a fail status." I guess we need to return 0 in the case of
rename.
Need more closer look at this patch.

- JV



>> return retval;
>> }
>> out_valid:
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-28 22:51    [W:0.086 / U:1.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site