[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] mutex: Apply adaptive spinning on mutex_trylock()
    On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 09:10 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

    > One solution is to have this be only done on explicit trylocks. Perhaps
    > introduce a mutex_trylock_spin()? Then when the developer knows that
    > this scenario does not exist, they can convert mutex_trylocks() into
    > this spinning version.

    I'm not sure this is even worth it, as I'm looking at the
    btfs/extend-tree.c code, this is the main reason to use mutex_trylock().

    I guess what you see in your benchmarks is that trylock contention
    happens mostly in the non-deadlock scenario. But I bet you have
    latencies when it does happen, but the benefit seems to out weigh it in
    the results.

    I wonder what happens if you run dbench as an RT task.

    -- Steve

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-03-25 14:31    [W:0.019 / U:80.480 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site