lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] x86: avoid atomic operation in test_and_set_bit_lock if possible
    On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:59:31AM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > [...] but you probably need to make a full pass to make sure we dont have a
    > > MSR failure -this should return false in this case.
    >
    > Wanted to keep this patch simple - we are not really hitting MSR
    > failure cases in practice, and by getting the message the user is at
    > least warned that *something* is amiss.

    AFAIR, Robert was telling me couple of months ago about some braindead
    BIOSes doing power management by using at least one perf counter. A
    radical approach like that might interfere with that BIOS since it will
    try to reprogram the counter continuously and f*ck up OS PMU use.

    Anyway, adding Robert for clarification.

    --
    Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

    Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
    Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
    General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
    Registration: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
    Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-03-25 11:53    [W:0.023 / U:0.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site