Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:56:20 -0600 | | From | Grant Likely <> | | Subject | Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets |
| |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:12:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:32:28PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > It's a different matter that DT has many hearts to win(at least in ARM > > Linux) > > So, perhaps the answer to Q(a) is - Yes. > > It's not really a question of hearts to win. Even for people who are > fully won over the implementation just isn't there in mainline and it's > not clear when it'll be delivered. Right now device tree can only be > used on SPARC, PowerPC and (I beleive) some x86 platforms.
MIPS and Microblaze too plus out-of-tree NIOS.
Regardless, I agree 100%. This isn't (er, shouldn't be) a device tree debate. The problem does need to be solved for existing platforms.
g.
|  |