Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:16:25 -0400 (EDT) | From | Len Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] ACPI, APEI patches for 2.6.39 |
| |
> > > > [PATCH 1/7] Add Kconfig option ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG > > > > [PATCH 2/7] lib, Add lock-less NULL terminated single list
> > > > [PATCH 3/7] ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache > > > > [PATCH 4/7] PCIe, AER, use pre-generated prefix in error information printing > > > > [PATCH 5/7] ACPI, APEI, Add PCIe AER error information printing support
I'll submit just 3,4,5/7 for upstream w/ the ACPI tree. I'd like to see andrew take 1,2,6 (which now need to be refreshed) in mm and when they ship, that will enable 7/7, which is the reason that they exist.
thanks, -Len
> > > > [PATCH 6/7] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless > > > > [PATCH 7/7] ACPI, APEI, GHES, printk support for recoverable error via NMI > > > > > > I've put this series into acpi-test, so it will be visible in linux-next; > > > but I'm not the right person to review the generic lockless stuff, > > > who is? > > > > I reviewed it earlier and it seemed good to me (unless it has > > changed), but Linus wanted non Intel reviewers too. Any takers? > > As for > > [PATCH 1/7] Add Kconfig option ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG > [PATCH 2/7] lib, Add lock-less NULL terminated single list > [PATCH 6/7] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless > > they are general kernel patches. I remember you have reviewed some > earlier version of these patches, and merged 1/2 into -mm tree. Do you > have time to review these patches? Although Andi has reviewed them, we > really need some non-Intel reviewers. > > Thanks, > Huang Ying > b >
| |