[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [git pull] drm fixes

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Dave Airlie wrote:

> 2011/3/23 Michel Dänzer <>:
>> On Mit, 2011-03-23 at 18:16 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> 2011/3/23 Michel Dänzer <>:
>>>> On Mit, 2011-03-23 at 04:18 +0000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>>> One radeon, 2 core fixes, and an interface update to allow for > 2 crtcs
>>>>> in vblank.
>>>> [...]
>>>>> Ilija Hadzic (1):
>>>>>       drm/kernel: vblank wait on crtc > 1
>>>> This patch was still being debated yesterday, are you deliberately
>>>> pushing it regardless? Once it hits mainline, it'll be pretty much set
>>>> in stone.
>>> From what I can see it was the userspace patches being debated, this
>>> one seemed fine and the interface looked okay to me.
>> The author ignored my suggestions to make the patch smaller and simpler,
>> more maintainable and more future-proof all at once.
> It was already small and I'm not sure merging the flags made it more
> maintainable. Its always
> being a slightly painful ioctl, and hopefully any future changes add a
> new ioctl esp if we want 64-bit values.
> The only comment I really thought was necessary was changing the CAP
> name, but since that isn't
> part of the ABI (just the number) we can quickly fix it with a follow-up.
> Dave.

All of the issues debated yesterday, except one, boil down to renaming a
handful on #defines without changing the values nor interface nor behavior
of the kernel. For those that I agreed, I'll follow up with a small patch

-- Ilija

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-23 12:57    [W:0.075 / U:1.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site