lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: Test for kmalloc/memset(0) pairs
    From
    Hi,

    On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
    >> Indeed that one seems to be quite out of date.  You can get the most
    >> recent version here: https://launchpad.net/~npalix/+archive/coccinelle
    >
    > With tools/coccinelle/ you would never run into such problems of distributing
    > the latest stable version to your fellow kernel developers: it would always be
    > available in tools/coccinelle/.
    >
    > Integration, synergy, availability, distribution and half a dozen other
    > buzzwords come to mind as to why it's a good idea to have kernel-focused
    > tools hosted in the kernel repo :-)
    >
    > IMO it's an option to consider.

    That's my thinking too. Yes, 80 KLOC of OCaml in the kernel tree
    sounds crazy but I think the practical advantages might be enough to
    justify it. Btw, would git-submodule be something to consider here?
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-03-20 12:09    [W:0.021 / U:31.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site