Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:13:38 +0100 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH x86/mm UPDATED] x86-64, NUMA: Fix distance table handling |
| |
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:06:41AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > Hmmm? I can't really follow your sentence. This is init stage. > > Anyways, why can't it just walk over the enabled nodes? What would be > > the difference? > > my point is that we really not need to go over it if original is not there.
Oh, you mean if (!phys_dist)? Yeah yeah sure, I was mostly talking about allocating new table separately and returning the count and all those things. Can you just do the phys_dist testing and going over enabled nodes?
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |