Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Mar 2011 12:10:15 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: Question about the vmlinuz file |
| |
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:25:24PM +0100, Alvaro Aguilera wrote: > Hello, > > perhaps someone here has a couple of minutes to explain me the > difference between these two vmlinuz files from different > distributions:
What distributions?
On my Fedora 12 laptop:
$ file /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32.23-170.fc12.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32.23-170.fc12.x86_64: Linux kernel x86 boot executable bzImage, version 2.6.32.23-170.fc12.x86_64 (mock, RO-rootFS, root_dev 0x902, swap_dev 0x3, Normal VGA
On my debian box:
$ file /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Linux kernel x86 boot executable bzImage, version 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (unknown@Deb, RO-rootFS, swap_dev 0x2, Normal VGA
> > $file /boot/vmlinuz > /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37-40-desktop: Linux/x86 Kernel, Setup Version > 0x20a, bzImage, Version 2.6.37, Version 2.6.37-40, RO-rootFS, root_dev > 0x301, swap_dev 0x4, Normal VGA
This seems to match my two boxes.
> > $file /boot/vmlinuz > vmlinuz: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, AMD x86-64, version 1, stripped > > the second file seems to be in ELF format and I cannot use it with my > cluster management software.
What distro is it?
> > Is there a parameter I can use to compile the kernel image in one > format or the other? or a tool to convert them?
When I build my own kernel on Debian I have:
$ file /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37.1+ /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37.1+: Linux kernel x86 boot executable bzImage, version 2.6.37.1+ (rostedt@gandalf) #23, RO-rootFS, root_dev 0x900, swap_dev 0x2, Normal VGA
Your second file looks more like a vmlinux than a vmlinuz file.
$ file vmlinux vmlinux: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped
-- Steve
| |