Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4 v3] smp_call_function_many issues from review | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:13:29 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 10:55 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com> wrote: > > > > Looking forward, I would suggest 1 and 2 are required for stable, 3 may > > be suitable as it fixes races that otherwise requires cpumask copies > > as in 75c1c91cb92806f960fcd6e53d2a0c21f343081c ([IA64] eliminate race > > condition in smp_flush_tlb_mm). By contrast 4 is just comments except > > for the %pS to %pf change. > > Ok, who should I expect to take this series from? I think the last > batch came through Andrew. The kernel/smp.c file seems to be one of > those "unclear maintenance rules" one. The git statistics for the last > 12 months seem to be > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> (commit_signer:4/9=44%) > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> (commit_signer:2/9=22%) > Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com> (commit_signer:2/9=22%) > Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> (commit_signer:2/9=22%) > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> (commit_signer:2/9=22%) > > according to get_maintainer.pl. Should I just take these directly?
I'm fine with that, if people want a maintainer I can volunteer, but as Jens wrote most of it I'd prefer him to sign off on that ;-)
| |