lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: PATCH: Add --size-check=[error|warning]
    Date
    Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:

    > * Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote:
    >
    >> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
    >>
    >> > * Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> writes:
    >> >>
    >> >> > Hi Andreas,
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> writes:
    >> >> >>> So what do you suggest that testers who want to, say, build old Linux
    >> >> >>> kernel versions with new binutils do?
    >> >> >
    >> >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com> wrote:
    >> >> >> The same that testers have to do in order to build old Linux kernel
    >> >> >> versions with current versions of make.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Are you saying it's OK to screw over binutils users because GNU Make
    >> >> > did that too?
    >> >>
    >> >> I'm just telling you the facts.
    >> >
    >> > And you are wrong - latest Make does not break reasonably old kernel builds such
    >> > as v2.6.30.
    >>
    >> This is just ridiculous.
    >> You are defining away facts just because they don't fit your view.
    >
    > No, i actually tried out the latest released Make version (3.82) and it still builds
    > v2.6.30 fine:

    That's a very convincing argument.

    Andreas.

    --
    Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com
    GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
    "And now for something completely different."


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-03-14 15:13    [W:0.022 / U:30.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site