Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:52:41 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: XIP doesn't depend on block | From | Marco Stornelli <> |
| |
2011/2/6 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>: > On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:15:00 +0100 Marco Stornelli wrote: > >> From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> >> >> XIP doesn't depend on block symbol, then we can reorder the Kconfig. >> For ext2 doesn't change the Kconfig behavior but if other fs will use >> FS_XIP it won't need to include block support if not needed. > > Hi Marco, > > Do you know of a filesystem where this matters? >
Yes, for example mine (pramfs) :)
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> >> --- >> >> --- Kconfig.orig 2011-01-19 00:14:02.000000000 +0100 >> +++ Kconfig 2011-02-06 16:04:51.000000000 +0100 > > This filename should include path, like > --- fs/Kconfig.orig > +++ fs/Kconfig > >> @@ -9,13 +9,6 @@ if BLOCK >> source "fs/ext2/Kconfig" >> source "fs/ext3/Kconfig" >> source "fs/ext4/Kconfig" >> - > > The 3 filesystems above are immediately under: > > if BLOCK > > so ext[234] depend on BLOCK. Why would it matter about FS_XIP? >
I don't know but for example even POSIX ACL was under "if BLOCK", maybe there is only an historical refuse.
Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |