[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: etm: Don't require clock control
    On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 06:54:19PM -0800, Arve Hj??nnev??g wrote:
    > If clk_get fail, assume the etb does not need a separate clock.
    > Signed-off-by: Arve Hj??nnev??g <>

    Would it not be cleaner for the affected platforms to ensure that
    clk_get() does the right thing here, for example by returning a dummy
    clock? Otherwise we'll just silently carry on if we can't get a clock
    we were supposed to which doesn't seem ideal.

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-02-03 13:49    [W:0.021 / U:0.796 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site