lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 24 Feb 2011 21:24:30 +0000
FromChris Ball <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1]mmc: set timeout for SDHCI host before sending busy cmd
Hi,

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:43:52PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> +1. A full cycle in linux-next might an idea to be on the safe side? That
> would be 2.6.40-material then. Or too slow?

I think it could be okay to merge for .39, but that's mainly because I
don't think we start getting testing with a lot of cards until patches
appear in an -rc1 -- so for something that requires broad testing, I'd
rather merge it for -rc1 with a plan to revert it if we find anything
unexpected.

But I don't have a strong opinion, so if anyone thinks there's a reason
to wait (for example, an existence-proof of a card that misbehaves when
configured with a max timeout value) then I'm happy to do so.

Thanks,

--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-24 22:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2010