Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:24:30 +0000 | | From | Chris Ball <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1]mmc: set timeout for SDHCI host before sending busy cmd |
| |
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:43:52PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > +1. A full cycle in linux-next might an idea to be on the safe side? That > would be 2.6.40-material then. Or too slow?
I think it could be okay to merge for .39, but that's mainly because I don't think we start getting testing with a lot of cards until patches appear in an -rc1 -- so for something that requires broad testing, I'd rather merge it for -rc1 with a plan to revert it if we find anything unexpected.
But I don't have a strong opinion, so if anyone thinks there's a reason to wait (for example, an existence-proof of a card that misbehaves when configured with a max timeout value) then I'm happy to do so.
Thanks,
-- Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child
|  |