[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: btusb autosuspend (was Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc6)
    On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:

    > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:25:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > Hmm. Is there any reason we shouldn't revert commit
    > > 556ea928f78a390fe16ae584e6433dff304d3014 given the regression?
    > I think reverting makes sense at the moment. I haven't seen the reported
    > issues - I need to figure out if this is related to bus powered/self
    > powered devices, or what else is causing the difference.
    > > It apparently had problems before too, and caused autosuspend to be
    > > disabled entirely, judging at least by
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > but there's obviously the comment about "those should be fixed now".
    > > Apparently there are more issues.
    > Right, we were autosuspending even when there were active connections.
    > Marcel told me that ought to be fixed and my testing seemed to agree...
    > > I have no idea whether this is a USB-level issue, or a driver-level
    > > one. There are no comments about exactly what fixed the input device
    > > issues. So I'm adding both BT and USB people to the discussion.
    > I'll try to get time to look at this this week. Marcel, any ideas?

    Take a look at Bugzilla #26182. I tried adding your address to the CC:
    list, but the only address I could find that Bugzilla would accept
    wasn't the same as the addresses you normally use.

    Alan Stern

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-02-24 15:57    [W:0.021 / U:39.684 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site