[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: btusb autosuspend (was Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc6)
    On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:25:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Hmm. Is there any reason we shouldn't revert commit
    > 556ea928f78a390fe16ae584e6433dff304d3014 given the regression?

    I think reverting makes sense at the moment. I haven't seen the reported
    issues - I need to figure out if this is related to bus powered/self
    powered devices, or what else is causing the difference.

    > It apparently had problems before too, and caused autosuspend to be
    > disabled entirely, judging at least by
    > but there's obviously the comment about "those should be fixed now".
    > Apparently there are more issues.

    Right, we were autosuspending even when there were active connections.
    Marcel told me that ought to be fixed and my testing seemed to agree...

    > I have no idea whether this is a USB-level issue, or a driver-level
    > one. There are no comments about exactly what fixed the input device
    > issues. So I'm adding both BT and USB people to the discussion.

    I'll try to get time to look at this this week. Marcel, any ideas?

    Matthew Garrett |

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-02-24 01:47    [W:0.037 / U:15.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site