[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/9] security: Make capabilities relative to the user namespace.
Serge E. Hallyn <> wrote:

> int (*capable) (struct task_struct *tsk, const struct cred *cred,
> - int cap, int audit);
> + struct user_namespace *ns, int cap, int audit);

Hmmm... A chunk of the contents of the cred struct are user-namespaced.
Could you add the user_namespace pointer to the cred struct and thus avoid
passing it as an argument to other things.

In fact, I think you probably have to do this so that cachefiles, for example,
can override the user namespace when it operates on behalf of a process that's
in another namespace.

In fact, looking later on in your patch, I see:

> - || (cap_capable(current, current_cred(), CAP_SETPCAP,
> + || (cap_capable(current, current_cred(),
> + current_cred()->user->user_ns, CAP_SETPCAP,

so the user_ns _is_ already available through the creds. So is there really a
need to pass it as an argument to anything that already takes a cred?

> * @cred contains the credentials to use.
> + * @ns contains the user namespace we want the capability in
> * @cap contains the capability <include/linux/capability.h>.

That should be tabbed to match the lines either side.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-23 12:43    [W:0.246 / U:0.656 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site