lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC,PATCH 2/3] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks
On 02/14/2011 05:41 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
>> A fixed clock may still have other operations such as enable/disable.
>
> Then it's not a fixed clock; I'd prefer this to be a separate type, as it's
> now hardware dependent.
>

I'm confused. If a clock's rate can't be changed and it can't be enabled
or disabled, then what's the point of representing that clock
signal/line as a clock in the driver. Seems like a "nothing to see here,
move along" type of clock. To express it differently, I find this
similar to "if (1) { ... }". Obviously I'm missing something here. What
is it?

-Saravana

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-15 05:53    [W:0.173 / U:1.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site