lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration
On 02/14/2011 10:27 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:14:15AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> I just want seperate setup_bootmem ( and maybe init_memory_mapping_high...)
>> out that __register__ function.
>>
>> that __register__ function do some sth like memblock_register to
>> early_node_map[] looks reasonable.
>
> Can you please provide some rationales _why_ you think setup_bootmem()
> should be moved elsewhere? Because it is not apparent to me and I
> cannot read your mind. I'm not against it given good enough reasons.
> After all, _technically_ it doesn't make one iota of difference, but I
> don't want to change it just because you don't like it and I don't
> think you want that either, so _please_ give me some explanations
> about what you want and _why_. It's not like we're involved in a
> romantic relationship and even when I'm in one I suck at that implied
> communication thing.

Never mind. will send out patch after your patches get merged into tip.

BTW, you may need to rebase your on top of tip/master.

Thanks

Yinghai


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-14 20:11    [W:0.064 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site