lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: 2.6.38 updates
From
Date
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 17:50 +0000, Will Newton wrote:
>
> It would observe a stale value, but that value would only be updated
> when the cache line was reloaded from main memory which would have to
> be triggered by either eviction or cache flushing. So it could get
> pretty stale. Whilst that's probably within the spec. of atomic_read I
> suspect it would lead to problems in practice. I could be wrong
> though.

Right, so the typical scenario that could cause pain is something like:

while (atomic_read(&foo) != n)
cpu_relax();

and the problem is that cpu_relax() doesn't know which particular
cacheline to flush in order to make things go faster, hm?





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-14 19:25    [W:0.277 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site