Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:07:13 +0100 | From | castet.matthieu@free ... | Subject | Re: [BUG] broken ebba638ae723d8a8fc2f7abce5ec18b688b791d7 |
| |
Quoting "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> On Tuesday, February 01, 2011, matthieu castet wrote: > Well, in my not so humble opinion the amount of random fixes required by the > entire NX protection of kernel "data" pages is simply unacceptable.
What's the relation between this bug and NX protection of kernel "data" ?
Matthieu
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |