lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework
Date
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:50:59 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >> That would imply that I'd done more than glance over them, and
> >> unfortunately I haven't :(
> >
> > Np, thanks for glancing :)
>
> I'd still like to ask for your Ack at least for the virtio_ids.h
> change (please see below, and for the full patch, see
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg59537.html):
>
> Anyone following our threads will know you approved it, but I'm still
> technically required to have your explicit ack as long as the patch
> isn't going through your tree.
>
> I can always add something like:
>
> Virtio_ids.h-change-acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> So it doesn't imply anything else but this specific change, or I can
> just put that hunk in a separate patch, and add then add your Acked-by
> (so it doesn't imply anything on the rest of the patch set).

It's usually done:

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (virtio_ids.h)

And I've added it to the next version of the virtio-spec, so noone else
grabs it.

Thanks!
Rusty.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-09 11:35    [W:0.089 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site