lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/2] DMA: PL330: Remove pm_runtime_xxx calls from pl330 probe/remove
From
Date
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:43 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Vinod Koul wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> > > amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable()
> > > for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need
> > > to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again.
> > > In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime
> > > functions, those functions need not be called from device remove.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes following run time error with pl330 driver.
> > >
> > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
> > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: failed to get runtime pm
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.maruthy@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> > Looks fine to me. Do you want these to go thru slave-dma or samsung
> > tree.
>
> Hi Vinod,
>
> I think, this patch can be sent to upstream via slave-dma tree and
> second one via Samsung tree separately and you can add my and Boojin
> Kim's ack(actually, she replied) on this when you apply.
Okay, I have applied this one only

--
~Vinod



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-08 09:21    [W:0.087 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site