Messages in this thread | | | From | Dong Aisheng-B29396 <> | Subject | RE: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support | Date | Tue, 6 Dec 2011 03:42:11 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:01 AM > To: Sascha Hauer > Cc: Dong Aisheng-B29396; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linus.walleij@stericsson.com; Guo Shawn- > R65073; kernel@pengutronix.de > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > wrote: > > > I don't think that this grouping of pads to their functions makes > > sense. On i.MX every pad is muxed independently and not in groups. > > Which pins belong to which function is board specific and not SoC > > specific. > > True, Dong can this be moved to the imx pinctrl platform data and passed > in from arch/arm/[plat|mach]-* board files instead? > That is probably where it belongs today. > Yes, I will do that.
> I know that this data is in drivers/pinctrl for the U300 and SIRF, but > that is because they only have one single board variant. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij
Regards Dong Aisheng
| |