Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:15:46 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 19:02, Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org> wrote: > Unfortunately, NO_IRQ is often not spelled "NO_IRQ". It looks like the assumption > "irq < 0 === no irq" may be quite a lot more widespread than "NO_IRQ === no irq".
Can we make irq unsigned, and hope the compiler catches all of them (comparison always false blah blah blah)?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |