lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] PM / Docs: Recommend the use of [un]lock_system_sleep() over mutex_[un]lock(&pm_mutex)
Hello,

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:38PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't get what you meant here. Are you talking about what
> needs to be added/changed in the documentation or, are you referring
> to the code itself and are saying that we must make these APIs
> internal to the PM alone?

Ooh, sorry about not being clear. I meant pm_mutex itself. There's
no reason to expose that outside of pm, right? And in the
documentation, we can just require use of the APIs instead of pm_mutex
itself.

Thank you.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-05 18:47    [W:0.045 / U:0.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site