Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:31:53 +0100 | From | Richard Cochran <> | Subject | Re: [PTP] Implement clock_getres() function correctly |
| |
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 06:07:43PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > clock_getres() needs to put the resolution into the provided timespec > > and return 0 in case of success. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Gah, wrong version.
Thanks for spotting that weird left over (from the old posix-timer.c code).
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
BTW, my email address has changed. Did you see my patch for MAINTAINERS a few weeks back? It would help when finding the current email address.
Thanks, Richard
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c > index cf3f999..6b0c02a 100644 > --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c > +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c > @@ -101,7 +101,10 @@ static s32 scaled_ppm_to_ppb(long ppm) > > static int ptp_clock_getres(struct posix_clock *pc, struct timespec *tp) > { > - return 1; /* always round timer functions to one nanosecond */ > + /* Resolution is one nanosecond */ > + tp->tv_sec = 0; > + tp->tv_nsec = 1; > + return 0; > } > > static int ptp_clock_settime(struct posix_clock *pc, const struct timespec *tp) > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |