lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Adding remoteproc/rpmsg to linux-next
Date
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:55:27 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you please add the following remoteproc tree to linux-next ?
> >>
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ohad/remoteproc.git for-next
> >
> > I have added that from today.
>
> Would you like rpmsg/remoteproc to go through arm-soc or do you prefer
> me to send a pull request directly to Linus ?
>
> If you prefer the former (IIRC you told me you might consider it in a
> random ELCE hallway conversation :) then I'll send you a pull request.
>
> I'm happy either way.

Either way works for me, too. Right now, I would tend to let you send it
to Linus directly because I haven't looked at the latest versions of the
code for some time. While I generally trust you to do the right thing
there, I'm not 100% comfortable to vouch for it in the way that an Ack
or pull would imply without doing a more detailed review of the latest
code.

I know that I promised you that review, but haven't gotten to it, sorry.
I've done a 5 minute review now and it absolutely looks good to go in
as far as I can tell, so I certainly don't object to you sending it
to Linus for 3.3. If you think you need more Acks or if there are other
reasons to have it go through arm-soc, please tell me and I'll try harder
to find the time for a proper review.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-22 16:25    [W:0.546 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site