Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:30:41 -0800 | From | Frank Rowand <> | Subject | Re: Android low memory killer vs. memory pressure notifications |
| |
On 12/20/11 18:07, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:14:18PM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
< snip >
>> And for embedded and for real-time, some of us do not want cgroups to be >> a mandatory thing. We want it to remain configurable. My personal >> interest is in keeping the latency of certain critical paths (especially >> in the scheduler) short and consistent. > > Much thanks for your input! That would be quite strong argument for going > with /dev/mem_notify approach. Do you have any specific numbers how cgroups > makes scheduler latencies worse?
Sorry, I don't have specific numbers. And the numbers would be workload specific anyway.
-Frank
| |